The CRA refused my client's request a second time. When can that decision go to judicial review, and how long do we have?
In 2026, a CRA decision goes to judicial review in the Federal Court when it is a discretionary ruling with no objection or Tax Court appeal behind it, such as a refused taxpayer relief request. Federal Courts Act s.18.1 gives 30 days from when the decision was first communicated. Assessments themselves go to the Tax Court instead.
Which CRA decisions go to the Federal Court, and which go to the Tax Court?
Judicial review is for a CRA decision where you believe the CRA didn't properly exercise its discretion canada.ca. An assessment is a different animal: your client objects, then appeals to the Tax Court, which has exclusive original jurisdiction over Income Tax Act and Part IX Excise Tax Act appeals
laws-lois.justice.gc.ca. Where a statute gives an appeal to the Tax Court, s.18.5 of the Federal Courts Act takes that decision out of judicial review to the extent it can be appealed
laws-lois.justice.gc.ca.
| CRA decision | Authority | Can your client object? | Route | Time limit |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Assessment or reassessment of tax | ITA 165, 169 | Yes | Objection, then Tax Court appeal | Objection: 90 days (individuals: later of 90 days or 1 year after the filing due date). Appeal: 90 days after confirmation |
| Refusal to cancel penalties or interest | ITA 220(3.1) | No, 165(1.2) bars it | Second review, then Federal Court | 30 days from the decision |
| Refusal of a late refund or reduction beyond the normal period | ITA 152(4.2) | No, 165(1.2) bars it | Second review, then Federal Court | 30 days from the decision |
| Refusal of a late, amended or revoked election | ITA 220(3.2) | No objection route in the Act | Federal Court | 30 days from the decision |
| Refusal to waive TFSA excess tax | ITA 207.06(1) | Discretionary waiver | Federal Court | 30 days from the decision |
| Refusal to waive the 1% a month RRSP overcontribution tax | ITA 204.1(4) | Discretionary waiver | Federal Court | 30 days from the decision |
Subsection 165(1.2) is the list to remember: no objection lies to an assessment made under 118.1(11), 152(4.2), 169(3) or 220(3.1) laws-lois.justice.gc.ca. Relief under 220(3.1) and 220(3.2) both use the word "may", which is what makes them discretionary
laws-lois.justice.gc.ca. So do the late refund power in 152(4.2)
laws-lois.justice.gc.ca, the TFSA waiver for a reasonable error
laws-lois.justice.gc.ca and the RRSP waiver
laws-lois.justice.gc.ca. The objection and appeal deadlines are on the notice of objection deadline and Tax Court appeal deadline pages
laws-lois.justice.gc.ca.
How do you count the 30 days?
Section 18.1(2) of the Federal Courts Act requires the application within 30 days after the decision was first communicated to your client, and only a Federal Court judge can allow more time, before or after the 30 days end laws-lois.justice.gc.ca. The CRA words it as 30 calendar days from the date your client received the decision
canada.ca. To be safe, count from the earliest date the decision reached your client or you, whether by mail or online.
Worked example. Your client's second review decision refusing interest relief arrives on Monday, October 19, 2026. Day 1 is October 20.
| Period | Days | Running total |
|---|---|---|
| October 20 to 31, 2026 | 12 | 12 |
| November 1 to 18, 2026 | 18 | 30 |
The notice of application has to be filed by Wednesday, November 18, 2026. If it issues that day, your client's supporting affidavits are due 30 days after issuance under rule 306, which is Friday, December 18, 2026 fct-cf.ca. The Federal Court publishes a deadlines calculator, but check its answer against the count above.
If you miss it, bring a motion for an extension of time; the Federal Court's guide lists a $20 fee for it where one applies fct-cf.ca. The CRA's own circular confirms the court can extend the 30 days
canada.ca. Treat that as a rescue, not a plan.
Why the second administrative review usually comes first
As a general rule, the CRA says to ask for a second administrative review before applying to the Federal Court canada.ca. Officials who handled the first review don't do the second, and the CRA calls it a new review and a new decision
canada.ca. The CRA doesn't state a deadline for asking. The circular adds that your client should wait until that review is finished before filing
canada.ca.
That new decision restarts the practical clock: the 30 days then run from the date your client receives the second decision canada.ca. Request it by writing to the address on the first decision letter, through your client's CRA account, or by letter to the intake centre for their province or territory, explaining why you disagree and adding new documents
canada.ca.
Use the second review to build the file the court will see. Under rule 317 any party can ask the CRA for the material in its possession that is relevant to the application, and the CRA has 20 days to send a certified copy under rule 318 fct-cf.ca. If a medical letter, bank statements or a timeline never reached the CRA, put them in the second review request, because the review asks whether the CRA's decision was reasonable on what it had.
What does the Federal Court look at, and what can it order?
The default standard is reasonableness. The Supreme Court's summary of Vavilov describes a reasonable decision as one built on a logical chain of reasoning that makes sense in light of the law and the facts scc-csc.ca. A court that finds a decision unreasonable should normally send it back to the decision maker. The statutory grounds in s.18.1(4) are broader than "unreasonable" alone
laws-lois.justice.gc.ca:
| Ground | Federal Courts Act | What it looks like in a CRA file |
|---|---|---|
| Acted without or beyond jurisdiction, or refused to exercise it | 18.1(4)(a) | The officer treated the 10 year limit as a bar when the request was in time |
| Breach of natural justice or procedural fairness | 18.1(4)(b) | Your submissions or documents were never considered |
| Error of law | 18.1(4)(c) | The officer applied the wrong test under 220(3.1) |
| Perverse or capricious finding of fact, or one made without regard to the material | 18.1(4)(d) | The decision ignores the hospital records you filed |
| Fraud or perjured evidence | 18.1(4)(e) | Rare in tax files |
| Any other conduct contrary to law | 18.1(4)(f) | Catch all |
On the remedy, the CRA is blunt: the court cannot change the CRA's decision, and if discretion was not properly exercised it can refer the decision back for reconsideration by a different delegated official canada.ca. The statute lets the court set the decision aside and send it back with the directions it considers appropriate
laws-lois.justice.gc.ca. The circular says the Federal Court cannot substitute its decision for the Minister's
canada.ca. A win buys your client a fresh decision, not the relief itself.
What are the court steps and fees after filing?
The application starts with Form 301, the notice of application, filed with the Federal Court registry and limited to one decision fct-cf.ca. The form is on the court's forms page
fct-cf.ca, and the fee is $50
fct-cf.ca.
| Step | Who | Deadline | Rule |
|---|---|---|---|
| File the notice of application (Form 301), $50 | Applicant | 30 days after the decision is first communicated | 300 to 303, FCA 18.1(2) |
| Serve the notice | Applicant (the Registry serves the Crown) | 10 days after issuance | 304(1), 133(1) |
| Notice of appearance (Form 305) | Respondent | 10 days after service | 305 |
| Certified CRA material, if requested | CRA | 20 days after the request is served | 317, 318 |
| Applicant's affidavits | Applicant | 30 days after issuance | 306 |
| Respondent's affidavits | Respondent | 30 days after service of the applicant's affidavits | 307 |
| Cross examinations on affidavits | Any party | 20 days after the respondent's affidavits (or the time for them) | 308 |
| Applicant's record, memorandum up to 30 pages | Applicant | 20 days after cross examinations end | 309 |
| Respondent's record | Respondent | 20 days after service of the applicant's record | 310 |
| Requisition for hearing (Form 314), $50 | Applicant | 10 days after the respondent's record | 314 |
The deadlines come from the Federal Court's procedural chart fct-cf.ca and its practice guide, which also says the Registry serves the Attorney General of Canada if you give it two extra copies
fct-cf.ca. Under rule 6(3), days in the seasonal recess (December 21 to January 7) aren't counted in the time for filing or serving a document unless the court directs otherwise
laws-lois.justice.gc.ca. Don't lean on that for the 30 days, which come from the Act, not the Rules.
When is judicial review the wrong tool?
When the real complaint is the amount of tax. The Federal Court's power to grant certiorari, mandamus and declarations against a federal board can only be used through an application under s.18.1 laws-lois.justice.gc.ca, and s.18.5 shuts that door wherever the Tax Court appeal is open
laws-lois.justice.gc.ca. Framing an assessment dispute as unfair CRA conduct doesn't move it to the Federal Court. Object on time instead.
Watch the split files. A reassessment that adds tax and a penalty, followed by a refused relief request, gives your client two tracks: the tax goes through objection and the Tax Court, the relief refusal goes to the Federal Court. Each has its own clock. For the relief request itself, see taxpayer relief with RC4288; for a refused late election, start from the CRA's late election page canada.ca.


Sources
CRA: judicial reviewcanada.ca
Taxpayer relief: after you apply (second review and judicial review)canada.ca
Refund or reduction beyond the normal period: after you applycanada.ca
CRA: amend, revoke or file a late tax electioncanada.ca
IC07-1R1 Taxpayer Relief Provisionscanada.ca
Federal Courts Act, section 18laws-lois.justice.gc.ca
Federal Courts Act, section 18.1 (application for judicial review)laws-lois.justice.gc.ca
Federal Courts Act, section 18.5 (exception for statutory appeals)laws-lois.justice.gc.ca
Tax Court of Canada Act, section 12 (exclusive jurisdiction)laws-lois.justice.gc.ca
Federal Courts Rules (rules 6 and 300 to 319)laws-lois.justice.gc.ca
Income Tax Act, section 152 (subsection 152(4.2))laws-lois.justice.gc.ca
Income Tax Act, section 165 (subsection 165(1.2))laws-lois.justice.gc.ca
Income Tax Act, section 169 (appeal to the Tax Court)laws-lois.justice.gc.ca
Income Tax Act, section 204.1 (RRSP excess waiver)laws-lois.justice.gc.ca
Income Tax Act, section 207.06 (TFSA tax waiver)laws-lois.justice.gc.ca
Income Tax Act, section 220 (subsections 220(3.1) and 220(3.2))laws-lois.justice.gc.ca
Federal Court: how to file an application for judicial reviewfct-cf.ca
Federal Court: procedural chart, application for judicial reviewfct-cf.ca
Federal Court: court and registry feesfct-cf.ca
Federal Court: forms (Form 301)fct-cf.ca
Supreme Court of Canada: Vavilov case in briefscc-csc.ca
Does my client have to ask for a second review before going to court?
Who is the respondent on a judicial review of a CRA decision?
The Attorney General of Canada is served in every case, along with the respondent and the tribunal, and the Registry serves the Attorney General if you file two extra copies of the notice fct-cf.ca.
Can the Federal Court cancel the penalties itself?
Can a GST/HST assessment go to judicial review?
No. Part IX of the Excise Tax Act is on the Tax Court's exclusive list, so a GST/HST assessment is objected to and appealed there laws-lois.justice.gc.ca. A discretionary GST/HST relief refusal is a different decision from the assessment itself.
General information for the tax year shown, not advice for a specific client. Confirm the facts before you file or remit.